⚙️ k3g Compliance & Governance

Relatório: pilot-device-compliance/service-candidate-enrichment-plan.md

Baixar .md

Service Candidate Enrichment Plan — 4WNET-MNS-KTG-RX

Date: 2026-04-29 Device: 4WNET-MNS-KTG-RX (ID: 1890) FASE: 2.9 Security: Read-only analysis, no writes, no tokens

Executive Summary

Analyzed 7 service candidates from ImportPlan for device 4WNET-MNS-KTG-RX.

Category Count Action
Ready for Review 1 Expedite to approval
Missing Metadata 6 Owner engagement required
Naming Failed 0 —
Ambiguous 0 —
Blocked 0 —
Ignored 0 —

Next Step: Engage service owners for metadata enrichment on 6 items (missing tenant).

1. Ready for Review (1 item)

Items that have sufficient metadata and can move to approval review.

BGP Peer: 203.0.113.1

  • Type: bgp_peer
  • Status: ✅ Ready for Review
  • Metadata Present:
  • Remote IP: 203.0.113.1
  • Device: 4WNET-MNS-KTG-RX
  • Confidence: exact
  • Metadata Missing:
  • remote_asn (tenant/ISP identification)
  • remote_bgp_group (logical grouping)
  • description (circuit/purpose)
  • Recommendation: Create ApprovalRecord with available data; request remote_asn from network team

2. Missing Required Metadata (6 items)

Items that cannot proceed to approval without enrichment.

Category: Missing Tenant (6 items)

Subinterfaces exist in device inventory but lack tenant assignment in NetBox.

Items:

  1. Eth-Trunk0.10
  2. Type: subinterface
  3. Parent: Eth-Trunk0 ✅ (exists in NetBox)
  4. Fields Present: name, enabled
  5. Fields Missing: tenant (REQUIRED), service_type, criticality
  6. Confidence: exact (from device inventory)

  7. Action: Engage service owner → request tenant assignment

  8. Eth-Trunk0.147

  9. Type: subinterface
  10. Parent: Eth-Trunk0 ✅ (exists in NetBox)
  11. Fields Present: name, enabled
  12. Fields Missing: tenant (REQUIRED), service_type, criticality
  13. Confidence: exact (from device inventory)

  14. Action: Engage service owner → request tenant assignment

  15. Eth-Trunk0.1580

  16. Type: subinterface
  17. Parent: Eth-Trunk0 ✅ (exists in NetBox)
  18. Fields Present: name, enabled
  19. Fields Missing: tenant (REQUIRED), service_type, criticality
  20. Confidence: exact (from device inventory)

  21. Action: Engage service owner → request tenant assignment

  22. Eth-Trunk0.1589

  23. Type: subinterface
  24. Parent: Eth-Trunk0 ✅ (exists in NetBox)
  25. Fields Present: name, enabled
  26. Fields Missing: tenant (REQUIRED), service_type, criticality
  27. Confidence: exact (from device inventory)

  28. Action: Engage service owner → request tenant assignment

  29. Eth-Trunk0.1606

  30. Type: subinterface
  31. Parent: Eth-Trunk0 ✅ (exists in NetBox)
  32. Fields Present: name, enabled
  33. Fields Missing: tenant (REQUIRED), service_type, criticality
  34. Confidence: exact (from device inventory)

  35. Action: Engage service owner → request tenant assignment

  36. 192.0.2.1/30 (IP Address)

  37. Type: ip_address
  38. Fields Present: address (192.0.2.1/30)
  39. Fields Missing: interface (REQUIRED), vrf (REQUIRED), tenant
  40. Confidence: exact (from device inventory)
  41. Action: Engage network team → clarify interface/VRF association

3. Enrichment Required Actions

By Priority

HIGH PRIORITY: - 5 subinterfaces (Eth-Trunk0.10, .147, .1580, .1589, .1606) waiting for tenant assignment - 1 IP address (192.0.2.1/30) waiting for interface/VRF mapping

MEDIUM PRIORITY: - 1 BGP peer (203.0.113.1) waiting for remote_asn/remote_bgp_group

By Owner

Service Team (Subinterfaces + IP): - Tenant assignment for 5 subinterfaces - VRF/interface mapping for IP address

Network Operations (BGP): - Remote AS number for peer 203.0.113.1 - BGP group classification

4. Enrichment Fields to Collect

Tenant Field (Subinterfaces)

Question: Which service/tenant does each subinterface belong to? Example: internet, mpls, corporate, guest Impact: Determines approval tier (strict vs. relaxed rules)

Service Type (Subinterfaces)

Question: What type of service? Options: circuit, L3VPN, MPLS, BGP, static, VLAN Impact: Risk assessment and rollback strategy

Criticality (Subinterfaces)

Question: Service criticality level? Options: high, medium, low Impact: Approval urgency and SLA commitment

VRF + Interface (IP Address)

Question: On which interface/VRF is this IP assigned? Example: GigabitEthernet0/5/0 in VRF internet Impact: Device configuration validation

Remote AS + BGP Group (BGP Peer)

Question: Peer AS number and logical grouping? Example: AS 65000, BGP group ISP-Uplink-1 Impact: BGP session validation and policy application

5. Timeline & Next Steps

Immediate (2026-04-29)

  • [x] Analysis completed
  • [x] Readiness categorized
  • [ ] Engage service owners (TODAY)

Week 1 (2026-05-02)

  • [ ] Service owner enrichment responses collected
  • [ ] VRF/interface mapping validated
  • [ ] Remote AS numbers confirmed

Week 2 (2026-05-09)

  • [ ] Create ApprovalRecords with enriched data
  • [ ] Risk assessment (BAIXO/MÉDIO/ALTO)
  • [ ] Dry-run validation

Week 3+ (2026-05-16)

  • [ ] Approval review and decision
  • [ ] Real batch execution
  • [ ] Compliance verification

6. Risk Assessment

Item Current Risk Blocker Mitigation
Eth-Trunk0.10-1606 (5x) MÉDIO Missing tenant Owner engagement
192.0.2.1/30 MÉDIO Missing interface/VRF Network ops mapping
203.0.113.1 (BGP) MÉDIO Missing remote_asn BGP team confirmation

Overall Risk Level: MÉDIO (6 items pending enrichment, no technical blockers)

7. Approval Prerequisites

Before any ApprovalRecord creation:

✅ Tenant assigned (service owner) ✅ Service type documented ✅ Criticality level set ✅ VRF/interface mapping confirmed ✅ Naming convention validated ✅ Parent objects exist (Eth-Trunk0 ✅) ✅ No secrets in metadata ✅ No naming injections

8. Security Notes

  • ✅ Analysis read-only (zero API writes)
  • ✅ No tokens used
  • ✅ No NetBox writes
  • ✅ No device configuration
  • ✅ Audit trail: this report documents enrichment gaps
  • ✅ Manual approval decision required before any write

9. Success Criteria (FASE 2.9)

  • [x] Service candidates categorized by readiness ✅
  • [x] Blockers and gaps identified ✅
  • [x] Enrichment requirements documented ✅
  • [x] Owner engagement plan established ✅
  • [x] No automatic changes to inventory ✅
  • [x] Audit trail complete ✅

Appendix: Readiness Tool Output

Script: tools/local/analyze_service_candidate_readiness.py Input: ImportPlan JSON for 4WNET-MNS-KTG-RX Output: Ready for Review (1), Missing Metadata (6), Naming Failed (0), Ambiguous (0), Blocked (0), Ignored (0) Generated: 2026-04-29T13:41:39Z

See Also

  • docs/45-service-candidate-enrichment-workflow.md
  • reports/pilot-device-compliance/service-candidate-readiness-test.md
  • tools/local/analyze_service_candidate_readiness.py

Voltar ao painel